Legal Opinion

State v. Sanchez

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1987No. 9551, 9635PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, Judge.

Defendants appeal from their convictions for burglary, raising the same issue on appeal. Citing Arabie v. State, 699 P.2d 890 (Alaska App.1985), each defendant asks this court to adopt an analysis of the New Mexico burglary statutes that would preclude his conviction for burglary. See NMSA 1978, §§ 30-16-3 and -4 (Repl. Pamp.1984). Defendant Sanchez raises this argument at the fourth calendaring notice .stage of his appeal. Defendant Landlee raises this argument in his motion for rehearing, a memorandum opinion affirming his conviction having been previously entered by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Arabie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  3. State v. RodriguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. OrtegaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. Office of the Public Defender Ex Rel. MuqqddinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. FoulenfontNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. BybeeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. BarraganNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. People v. RidenourColorado Court of Appeals · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API