Legal Opinion
Sarah W.J. Pell v. Azar Nut Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 11, 1983No. 82-1609PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY,
Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Sarah Pell filed a complaint in the federal district court of Kansas against Azar Nut Company and Continental Airlines. She alleged that Continental served her a package of Azar’s peanuts on a flight from Houston, Texas to Phoenix, Arizona and that she fractured a tooth on a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Wallace & Tiernan Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Michael Sanders, and Cross-Appellants v. International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers, Afl-Cio, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
3Cited by95 opinions
- In Re Donald Dean Walker, Debtor. Donald Dean Walker v. Kenneth G.M. Mather, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Fisher v. LynchDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Candi Ryder v. The City of Topeka and Michael MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Joanne K. Petrini v. Dorothy M. Howard Edward T. Doler, and United States of America, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- James R. Baker v. The Penn Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.