Legal Opinion

Brown & Adams v. United Button Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 10, 1906No. 19PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Delaware.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.

The question is whether a claim for unliquidated damages, resulting from injury to the property of another, not connected with or growing out of any contractual relation, is provable in' bankruptcy. The appellants, Brown & Adams, are wool dealers in Boston, Mass., and have a warehouse there for the storage of wool which adjoins a building formerly used for a number of years by the United Button Company, bankrupt, as a factory; the two being simply separated by a party wall. Wool in storage needs to be kept at a cool and even temperature; and the charge is that, by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Wetmore v. MarkoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Crawford v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Audubon v. ShufeldtSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Dunbar v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. In re New York Tunnel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
  4. Clarke v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1910
  5. Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API