Legal Opinion

Soper v. Purdy

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 28, 1999No. 98-047PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The plaintiff, Taylor Soper, appeals the decision of the Superior Court (Fitzgerald, J.) denying his motion for summary *269judgment, partially granting defendant Linda Purdy’s cross-motion for summary judgment, and dismissing his assumpsit claim against the defendant. The plaintiff also appeals the decision of the Superior Court (Smith, J.) entering judgment in favor of the defendant in the plaintiff’s quantum meruit claim. We reverse in part, affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

The record reveals the following undisputed facts. In April 1989, the plaintiff and the defendant executed a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Healey v. New Durham Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. Galloway v. Chicago-Soft, Ltd.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  4. Dwire v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. Gould v. George Brox, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. A&B Lumber Co. v. VrushoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  2. General Electric Co. v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Revenue AdministrationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  3. Klar v. MitoulasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  4. J. Krist Schell v. Thomas V. KentDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
  5. Steven Zannini v. Phenix Mutual Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API