Legal Opinion

Pearson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 13, 1992No. CR-90-1405PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Feordis and Annette Pearson, husband and wife, were indicted for the felony of child abuse, a violation of Ala. Code 1975, § 26-15-3. After a jury trial, they were convicted of the misdemeanor offense of endangering the welfare of a child, a violation of Ala. Code 1975, § 13A-13-6. They were sentenced to 225 days' imprisonment.

We reverse the convictions and render judgments of acquittal in favor of the appellants because the State's evidence was not sufficient, as a matter of law, for the jury to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellants were guilty.

I

The State's evidence…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Tibbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. People v. . GalboNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Holsemback v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  2. Gargis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  3. Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. Ruggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API