Pearson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Feordis and Annette Pearson, husband and wife, were indicted for the felony of child abuse, a violation of Ala. Code 1975, § 26-15-3. After a jury trial, they were convicted of the misdemeanor offense of endangering the welfare of a child, a violation of Ala. Code 1975, § 13A-13-6. They were sentenced to 225 days' imprisonment.
We reverse the convictions and render judgments of acquittal in favor of the appellants because the State's evidence was not sufficient, as a matter of law, for the jury to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellants were guilty.
I
The State's evidence…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Tibbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- People v. . GalboNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Holsemback v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Gargis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Ruggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.