Legal Opinion

Ruggs v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 29, 1992No. CR-91-370PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Henry James Ruggs, Jr., was convicted of trafficking in cocaine and of failure to affix tax stamps on controlled substances, in violation of § 13A-12-231(2)(a) and §40-17A-9, Code of Alabama 1975, respectively. He was sentenced to 10 years under the split sentence act, with 3 years to be served in prison and 3 years on supervisory probation. The appellant was also ordered to pay a $50,000 fine.

The appellant presents four issues on appeal.

I

Initially, the appellant contends that the court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal, because, he argues, the evidence…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Robert Edward Dickens, Sr., Gus Peter Glenos and Robert Morrison, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. McCray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  4. Friedman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. Germany v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API