Legal Opinion

Reed v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 1986No. 14548PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Presiding Judge.

Movant’s motion under Rule 27.26 was denied without an evidentiary hearing. He appeals, contending that the dismissal was improper because his motion alleged faces stating that he was sentenced as a persist ent offender based upon a conviction which was invalid because he was not represented by counsel.

Movant pled guilty to charges of burglary and of stealing and was sentenced as a persistent offender. During the plea hearing movant acknowledged that he had been convicted of two prior felonies and, upon inquiry of the trial judge, stated that he was represented by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rice v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Murphy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Green v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atkins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Sandy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API