Legal Opinion

Turner v. Dobson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This appeal presents the question of the validity as to subsequent creditors of a chattel mortgage on a fluctuating stock of goods. The complaint attacking the mortgage was filed by the assignee of such creditors. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained by the court below, and, the plaintiff refusing to amend, a decree of dismissal was entered. We are to determine, therefore, whether the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of suit.

The following facts appear from the complaint and the exhibits thereto attached.

On September 25, 1939, the defendants Dobson and wife executed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Etheridge v. SperrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. First Nat. Bank of Burns v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Kenney v. HurlburtOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State v. Deschutes CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Edwin C. Eberly and Elsie Eberly, Husband and Wife v. Frank A. Dudley, as Trustee of the Estate of Duvall's, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Dudley v. EberlyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1962
  3. Territory of Alaska ex rel. Commissioner of Veterans' Affairs v. GuerinDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1956
  4. Wochnick v. TRUE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. In re DavisDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API