Legal Opinion

Glanton v. Shafto

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 11, 1944Published

1Opinion of the Court

Giordano, C. P. J.

This is an appeal from an award made-by the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau in favor of the-petitioner, Charles Glanton, and against the respondent,. Joseph A. Shafto.

The court has appraised the proofs and in my opinion they establish the following facts:

Charles Glanton, the petitioner-appellee, is a colored man,, approximately 37 years of age, employed at Shafto’s Garage (Joseph A. Shafto, respondent-appellant) as a handy man and mechanic’s helper. He earned $22 a week. He took orders from Joseph Shafto and the head mechanic, one Fred Smith. He had thus been employed for at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Auten v. JohnstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Mountain Ice Co. v. DurkinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  3. Jackson v. New York Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Newell v. Workmen's Compensation BureauSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  5. Berman v. LevensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API