Legal Opinion

N. M. Albbet & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 5, 1956No. C. D. 1789PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise involved in these protests, consolidated at a pretrial conference, consists of crude feathers assessed with duty at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1518 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, and the President’s proclamation of May 4, 1948, T. D. 51909. Neither the rate of duty nor the classification of the merchandise is in controversy. It is claimed, however, that duty was assessed on too great a weight of merchandise; that an allowance for dirt and impurities in excess of the amount usually *295f…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marriott v. BruneSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Lawder v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Consolidated Elevator Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  4. Shallus v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Seeberger v. Wright & Lawther Oil & Lead Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API