Legal Opinion

United States v. Daniel John Marshall

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 13, 2005No. 03-3133PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Daniel John Marshall pleaded guilty to manufacturing and attempting to manufacture five grams or more of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846. The *893district court1 concluded that Marshall was not entitled to a reduction under the safety-valve provision and denied his motion for downward departure. Marshall sought a downward departure based on his extraordinary post-offense rehabilitation. The court sentenced him to seventy months’ imprisonment under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Marshall appeals, arguing that the district…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. Louis F. PiraniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas MickelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Whirlwind SoldierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Isidro Plancarte-Vazquez, Also Known as Isidro Plancarte-Rueda, United States of America v. Manuel PlancarteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Jeremy KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API