Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1999No. H018379PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WUNDERLICH, J.

I. Introduction

The People have petitioned for a writ of mandate directing respondent court to vacate its order releasing real party in interest, Jeffrey W. Roam (Roam), on supervised own recognizance (supervised OR) to attend a drug rehabilitation program at the Delancey Street Foundation (Delancey Street) in Los Angeles. Because Roam pleaded guilty to a serious felony, and also to four prior convictions which qualify as strikes under the “Three Strikes” law,1 the People contend that the court acted in excess of its jurisdiction in deferring sentencing and releasing Roam…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Oster v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. Superior Court (Stanley)California Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. NobletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re VarnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Cathcart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. People v. CarrilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. People v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. In Re VarnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API