State v. Lee
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. LEE 601 Cite as
290 Neb. 601
CONCLUSION Because the juvenile court’s orders affected Melissa’s sub- stantial right to raise her children, they were final and appeal- able. Upon our de novo review, we find that the evidence supports the juvenile court’s order changing the primary per- manency objective from reunification with Melissa to adoption, with a concurrent plan of reunification with the father for the three oldest children and a concurrent plan of guardianship for the three youngest children. We therefore affirm the juvenile court’s order in each case.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. McLeodNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. AmayaNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HaynesNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- In re Interest of Octavio B.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. HesslerNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. PayneNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. JenkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.