Phi Delta Theta Co. v. Moore
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice ENOCH, joined by Justice HECHT, dissenting to the improvident grant.
This case presents a significant issue that we have never taken up. The issue, broadly stated, is what tort liability rule should apply when a participant in a sports or recreational activity sues over an injury suffered during play. The practical importance of this issue is undeniable because the every-day scenarios that may give rise to it are myriad. Indeed, it is hard to imagine a sport or recreational activity whose participants, sponsors, coaches, and venue providers will not be affected by our treatment of this…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Morgan v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Turcotte v. FellNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Southwest Key Program, Inc. v. Gil-PerezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Chrismon v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Leonard Ex Rel. Meyer v. BehrensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Schneider Ex Rel. Schneider v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Dunagan, Orville Paul v. Coleman, Bryan, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.