Legal Opinion

Phi Delta Theta Co. v. Moore

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1999No. 98-0601PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice ENOCH, joined by Justice HECHT, dissenting to the improvident grant.

This case presents a significant issue that we have never taken up. The issue, broadly stated, is what tort liability rule should apply when a participant in a sports or recreational activity sues over an injury suffered during play. The practical importance of this issue is undeniable because the every-day scenarios that may give rise to it are myriad. Indeed, it is hard to imagine a sport or recreational activity whose participants, sponsors, coaches, and venue providers will not be affected by our treatment of this…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Morgan v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Turcotte v. FellNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Southwest Key Program, Inc. v. Gil-PerezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Chrismon v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  3. Leonard Ex Rel. Meyer v. BehrensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. Schneider Ex Rel. Schneider v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Dunagan, Orville Paul v. Coleman, Bryan, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API