Chapman v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBrowning, J.
Cynthia A. Chapman appeals a final order issued by Appellee, Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, affirming the appeals referee’s determination that Chapman was not eligible for unemployment compensation benefits because she was not “able to work and available for work” within the meaning of the pertinent statutes and rule. Chapman, who was unrepresented by counsel in the administrative proceedings and is pro se in this Court, contends that she was wrongfully denied unemployment benefits without a satisfactory explanation. Because some of the referee’s factual grounds for finding Chapman…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dept. of Ins. v. Southeast Volusia Hosp. Dist.Supreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Florida Industrial Commission v. CiarlanteSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Teague v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMM.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Malu v. SECURITY NAT. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Cargill, Inc. v. HillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arbor Tree Management, Inc. v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Grell v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- WHS Trucking LLC v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Gonzalez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Marsocci v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.