Legal Opinion
Zuckerman v. Antenucci
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1984PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sidney Leviss, J.
This is a posttrial motion for judgment against defendants Joseph Antenucci and Jose Pena, in the sum of $4,000,000 (CPLR 4404).
Daniel Zuckerman, an infant, by his mother and natural guardian, Elaine Zuckerman, and Elaine Zuckerman, individually, brought a medical malpractice action against Dr. Joseph Antenucci and Dr. Jose Pena. Both had treated the mother during pregnancy. Although the summons did not state that the two defendants were partners, the undisputed, unopposed and uncontradicted evidence at the trial established that relationship, and that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Caplan v. CaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Pedersen v. Manitowoc Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Jet Age Knitwear Machinery Corp. v. PhilipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. KaufmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Wedtech Corp. v. Nofziger (In Re Wedtech Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Liberty Associates v. EtkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Fanelli v. AdlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Keech v. Mead Johnson and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.