Legal Opinion
Zesiger v. Zesiger
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 27, 1998No. 96 Civ. 7819(RLC)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
This action arises from an alleged breach of a divorce settlement. Pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P., defendant now moves for summary judgment and plaintiff cross-moves for partial summary judgment.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff Judith C. Zesiger and defendant Albert L. Zesiger were divorced pursuant to a judgment entered by the New York State Supreme Court on or about September 1, 1989. The judgment Incorporated by reference but did not merge the terms of a settlement agreement, dated August 25, 1989 (the “Settlement Agreement”), which, inter alia, set forth…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pressman v. Estate of SteinvorthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Belgrave Owners, Inc. v. OR Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Brown v. KeatingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.