Weil v. Chu
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Mikoll, J.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the State Tax Commission which sustained personal income tax assessments imposed under Tax Law article 22.
Petitioners* Russell T. Weil, Stuart S. Dye, Robert J. Hickey and Ronald A. Capone are attorneys in the Washington, D.C., office of the law firm of Kirlin, Campbell & Keating (hereinafter the law firm), which also has an office in New York City. Petitioners commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Steinbeck v. GerosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Steinbeck v. GerosaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Metropolitan Package Store Ass'n v. KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Turner Construction Co. v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lanzi v. Alabama Dept. of RevenueCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
- Weil v. ChuNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Leach v. ChuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- 595 Investors Ltd. Partnership v. BidermanNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Farmer v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.