Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Brandon Dale Backstrom

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 2, 2020No. 77134-5Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 77134-5-I ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) BRANDON DALE BACKSTROM, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) Appellant. ) ) VERELLEN, J. — Trial courts must meaningfully consider, but have considerable discretion to weigh, the mitigating factors of youth when sentencing a defendant convicted of crimes committed as a juvenile. Because the trial court meaningfully considered mitigating evidence of Brandon Backstrom’s youthfulness during resentencing, including evidence of his capacity for rehabilitation, the court did not abuse…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Aiken v. ByarsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  4. State v. RamosWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. BassettWashington Supreme Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API