Home for Care of Inebriates v. Reis
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1ConcurrenceDe Haven, J.
—I concur in the judgment of affirmance, upon the ground that mandamus is not the proper remedy, but I dissent from so much of the opinion of Mr. Justice Sharpstein as holds that the act of March 17, 1876 (Stats. 1875-76, p. 325), is repealed by the later act of March 5, 1889 (Stats. 1889, p. 62); and upon this latter point I adopt as a correct statement of the law the opinion of Mr. Commissioner Belcher, prepared for the court upon the former submission of this case. In that opinion it is said: —
“ By an act of the legislature, approved April 1, 1870 (Stats. 1869-70, p. 585), it was provided…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People of the State of N.Y. v. . QuiggNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Ex parte LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889