Legal Opinion
Marchese v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 11, 1986No. Civ. 78-4298-WMBPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
WM. MATTHEW BYRNE, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff, Dominic Márchese, filed this action against Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc. (Shearson), a securities broker and futures commission merchant, seeking a declaratory judgment that “interest and increment” on margin funds maintained pursuant to section 4d of the Commodities Exchange Act (CEA), 7 U.S.C. section 6d (1982 & Supp. Ill 1985), may not be retained by Shearson in excess of its lawful commission. The action is brought on behalf of a class consisting of all persons, who, within the relevant limitations period,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Randy BIBBO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Miller v. Pacific Shore FundingDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc. And David Joe Ragan v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Sansom Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Dominic Marchese v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc., (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Camelart Limited v. Stonex Group Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.