Love Jeet Kaur v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRADFORD, Judge.
INTRODUCTION 1
To combat what it perceives to be the growing problem of synthetic drugs such as “Spice,” “Bath Salt,” and “Black Mamba,” the General Assembly has enacted a statutory scheme that defines such drugs and criminalizes dealing or possessing them (referred 1 to collectively as “the Synthetic Drug Law”). One feature of the Synthetic Drug Law is that the Indiana Board of Pharmacy (“the Board”) is given the power to declare new compounds illegal synthetic drugs by emergency rule. Appellant/Defendant Love Jeet Kaur has been charged with dealing and possession of a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Brady v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gary Elvers v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Tiplick v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Rodregus Morgan v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Aadil Ashfaque v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Ashfaque v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.