Ashfaque v. State

MAY, Judge.

[1] Aadil Ashfaque appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss Count I, Class D felony dealing in a synthetic drug1 and *185Count II, Class D felony possession of a synthetic drug.2 He presents multiple issues for our review, one of which we find dispositive: whether, at the time of Ash-faque’s alleged offenses, Ind.Code § 35-48-4-10(a), which prohibited dealing in a synthetic drug, and Ind.Code § 35-48-4-11, which prohibited possession of a synthetic drug, were unconstitutionally vague when the synthetic drug alleged to have been dealt in or possessed was not listed in the relevant…