Legal Opinion

Albert Lee v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 4, 1966No. 20586PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966) requires rejection of appellant’s contention that the rule of Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964) should be applied retrospectively to his in-custody interrogation. The fact that the questioning was secretly recorded, and the recording introduced in evidence, does not in itself present a constitutional violation. Lopez v. United States, 373 U.S. 427, 438-440, 83 S.Ct. 1381, 10 L.Ed.2d 462 (1963); Benson v. People of State of California, 336 F.2d 791 (9th Cir., 1964); Carbo…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. Vincent D. Todisco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FrazierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Frank Finley v. Baxter RittenhouseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Reese v. NixonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1972
  4. Frank Antonio Pavao v. Harold J. Cardwell, Warden, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Saunders v. CahillDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API