Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 11, 1971No. 55410PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOCKARD, Commissioner.

After two unavailing appeals to this court on the merits of his conviction of assault with intent to kill (State v. Montgomery, Mo., 370 S.W.2d 316 and 424 S.W.2d 744), Samuel Montgomery has now appealed from the order of the trial court denying relief on his motion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R. We affirm.

The record of his trial shows that on October 30, 1960, defendant said to Roy Witherspoon, “I am going to kill you,” and that he then shot him. After Witherspoon fell to the ground, defendant stood over him and fired three more shots, two striking him…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. DonnellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. State v. BenisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. McClain v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. State v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  5. State v. HornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API