Legal Opinion
Carriage Hill Management, LLC v. Austin Hartley, et al.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 25, 2026No. 8:26-cv-00422Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CARRIAGE HILL MANAGEMENT, LLC, * Plaintiff, * Civil Action No. 8:26-cv-00422-PX v. * AUSTIN HARTLEY, et. al., * Defendants. * *** MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending in this employment dispute is Defendants Austin Hartley and Parkland LLC (collectively, “Hartley”)’s1 Partial Motion to Dismiss a liability theory included within Plaintiff Carriage Hill (“Carriage Hill”)’s breach of contract claim. ECF No. 4. The motion is fully briefed, and no hearing is necessary. See D. Md. Loc. R. 105.6. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Goodman v. Praxair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Rockville Cars, LLC v. City of RockvilleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.