Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1935No. 4352PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice.

' The state of Texas, as plaintiff, sued Mrs. Wright and her husband, alleging that defendants justly owed it the amount of taxes, interest, penalties, and costs for the year 1932 as set out in the schedule attached to ■said petition, on approximately 30,000 acres ■ of land fully described in the petition and situated in Cochran county. The prayer is for •judgment for- the amount of taxes, Interest, and penalties due, with foreclosure of the tax lien upon eight tracts of land against which the taxes set out in the schedule were assessed. No question is raised as to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rowland v. City of TylerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Texas Power & Light Co. v. CulwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Hacker v. HoweNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Johnson v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. City of Wichita Falls v. J. J. & M. Taxman Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. Fenner, Beane & UngerleiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Aycock v. Travis CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Exporters & Traders Compress & Warehouse Co. v. City of MarlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Wiley v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Aycock v. Travis CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API