Legal Opinion

Barela v. Variz

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 19, 1999No. 98-1186-JFSPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE [8-1]

STIVEN, United states Magistrate Judge.

A hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss was held in Courtroom E, on January 19, 1999, before the Honorable James F. Stiven, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to Local Rule 72.3. and 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Plaintiff Carlos Barela (Chavaris), pro se and in forma pauperis, appeared tele-phonically, and Michelle A. Des Jardins, Deputy Attorney General for the State of California, appeared in court on behalf of Defendants.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On June 29, 1998, Plaintiff filed a federal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. James Blakely v. Robert WardsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. Marc Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  3. James Blakely v. Robert WardsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  4. Martinez v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  5. Tafari v. HuesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API