Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Bowen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1986No. 00879PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The issue is whether an option clause for the purchase of land contained in a partnership agreement is valid. We find the option is valid and therefore affirm the grant of specific performance by the trial court.

The source of the present litigation is a partnership agreement which Appellant Bert A. Bowen and Appellee Donald V. Snyder entered into in 1969. In essence, each man paid $6,000 to acquire a one-half interest in the part*50nership which held title to slightly more than 1400 acres of unimproved land on Jack’s Mountain in Mifflin County. Paragraph 14 of the partnership…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Steuart v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Payne v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Clark v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Barr v. DeiterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Welsh Et Ux. v. Ford Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Villoresi v. FemminellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Oliver, J. v. Ball, L. v. Harmon, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Wagner v. Estate of RummelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. In re GonzalezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Allentown Patriots, Inc., a/k/a Allentown Patriots of Allentown, PA v. City of Allentown and E.J. PawlowskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API