Legal Opinion
Board of County Commissioners v. Conder
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 9, 1996No. 95SC431Published
1Opinion of the Court
927 P.2d 1339 (1996)
The BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LARIMER COUNTY, Courtlyn Hotchkiss, James Disney and Janet Duvall, County Commissioners, Petitioner,
v.
Steve CONDER and Wendy Sommervold, Respondents.
No. 95SC431.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
December 9, 1996.
Harden, Schmidt, Hass, Haag & Hallberg, P.C., George H. Hass, Jeannine S. Haag, Larimer County Attorney's Office, Fort Collins, for Petitioner.
John H. Chilson, Loveland, for Respondents.
Justice LOHR delivered the Opinion of the Court.
This case presents the issue of whether a county can adopt a requirement in its subdivision…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Van Sickle v. BoyesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Cottrell v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Co. v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Ford Leasing Development Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Holly Development, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.