Legal Opinion

Pickens v. Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 1, 2021No. 1:20-cv-03470Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BRUCE PICKENS, Plaintiff, No. 20 C 3470 v. Judge Thomas M. Durkin MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Bruce Pickens alleges the sunroof window in his Mercedes-Benz car spontaneously shattered. He brings various claims against Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC seeking relief for that incident. Mercedes has moved to dismiss all claims. R. 49. That motion is granted. Legal Standard A Rule 12(b)(6) motion challenges the “sufficiency of the complaint.” Berger v. Nat. Collegiate Athletic Assoc.,

843…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Patrick Camasta v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Edward Tobey v. Brenda ChibucosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API