Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 26, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00724Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Valerie Richardson, Civil No. 3:25-CV-00724 (SVN) Plaintiff, v. Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company, September 26, 2025 Defendant. RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTON TO COMPEL Plaintiff, Valerie Richardson, moves this Court to enter an order compelling certain discovery from Defendant Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company (“Liberty”) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel is GRANTED in part and MOOT in part. ECF No. 34. I. LEGAL STANDARD Rule 26(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Construction Products Research, Inc. Five Star Products, Inc. And H. Nash BabcockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- In re PE Corporation Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.