Navin Kumar Sharma v. Nancy A. Berryhill

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NAVIN K. S.,1 Case No. ED CV 18-02676-RAO 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND 14 ORDER ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of 15 Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Navin K. S. (“Plaintiff”) challenges the Commissioner’s denial of his 20 application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). For 21 the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. 22 II. PROCEEDINGS BELOW 23 On October 7, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Title II application…