Legal Opinion

Romero v. Department of Defense

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 3, 2011No. 2010-3137Published

1Opinion of the Court

658 F.3d 1372 (2011)

Wilfredo ROMERO, Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Respondent.

No. 2010-3137.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 3, 2011.

James C. Cox, Jenner & Block, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for the petitioner. Of counsel on the brief was Arthur B. Spitzer, ACLU of the Nation's Capital, of Washington, DC.

Elizabeth M. Hosford, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Department of the Navy v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Rayburn F. HESSE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. Bennett v. Merit System Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  4. Romero v. Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Romero v. Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API