Haslett v. Minetti
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Petitioner received a fair trial, in accordance with the requirements of section 22 of the Civil Service Law, at the hands of an impartial trial commissioner, whose findings and recommendations were approved by the respondent’s predecessor in office. No error was committed in receiving the notice of “ particularization of charges ”'in the course of the trial, since petitioner had ample opportunity thereafter to meet any change in the charges occasioned by that notice. It should be emphasized that petitioner was not charged with having accepted benefits from companies doing business with the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Brenner v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Suttforb Realty Corp. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976