Legal Opinion

Lord v. City of Tucson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 18, 1969No. 2 CA-CIV 606PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Judge.

Appellant petitioner, Blaine J. Lord, sought a writ of prohibition against respondent, appellee, City of Tucson, to enjoin the city from levying and collecting assessments, and from the sale of land thereunder on the ground that the city lacked jurisdiction to confirm the assessment without having first authorized an improvement bond, A.R.S. § 9-636. The writ was denied and petitioner appeals. During the time between denial and appeal, the land was sold at auction.

The facts are somewhat confusing. On March 1, 1966, the City filed an eminent domain action to open and widen a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. J. R. Francis Construction Co. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. City of Phoenix v. LockwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Franklin Financial v. New Empire Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Sandblom v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 640 v. KayetanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. 2DP Blanding, LLC v. PalmerUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. WardenMontana Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API