Legal Opinion

Meeks v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 23, 1896No. Nos. 9797-(31)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Brill, J., denying a motion for a new trial.'

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

On March 20, 1895, the plaintiff was injured by a defect in a sidewalk of the defendant, and this action was brought to recover damages for such injury. He recovered $3,000, and the defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

1. The first assignment of error is that the trial court erred in admitting evidence as to the probable cost of medical treatment of the plaintiff subsequent to the trial. Evidence was offered, on behalf of the plaintiff, tending to show that there was a withering or atrophy of the muscles of his left shoulder joint, particularly the deltoid, as a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. Village of West DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoppe v. Boulevard Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Gray v. Minnesota Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Durose v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API