Daun v. Truax
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Jane Daun, a minor, and John Daun, her father, the plaintiffs, appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants rendered in an action for personal injuries by the minor (hereafter referred to as plaintiff) when she was hit by an automobile driven by Roy Truax (hereafter referred to as defendant). The main contention of plaintiff is that certain instructions given by the trial court on the issue of her contributory negligence were conflicting, contradictory, inconsistent and prejudicial. This contention is supported by the recent case of Cummings v. County of Los Angeles, ante, p. 258 [14…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Courtell v. McEachenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Dingman v. AF Mattock CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Mecchi v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Cole v. RidingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Stroud v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Mundy v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- Esquivel v. NancarrowArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Holstedt v. NeighborsWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
- Brown v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.