Legal Opinion

In re Netflix, Inc. Securities Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 5, 2024No. 4:22-cv-02672Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FIYYAZ PIRANI, Case No. 22-cv-02672-JST 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 NETFLIX, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 31 Defendants. 11 12 13 Before the Court is Defendants Netflix, Inc. (“Netflix” or the “Company”), Reed Hastings, 14 Ted Sarandos, Spencer Neumann, and Gregory Peters’s motion to dismiss the consolidated 15 amended class action complaint (“CAC”). ECF No. 31. The Court will grant the motion. 16 I. BACKGROUND1 17 Lead Plaintiff Fiyyaz Pirani, as a trustee of Imperium Irrevocable Trust, brings…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API