Legal Opinion
Pearson v. United States
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 19, 2003No. 2:02-cr-00040PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ADELMAN, District Judge.
I. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Patricia Pearson (“petitioner”) brings this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 claiming that she was denied due process because she was sentenced based on false information. I previously stayed execution of the sentence pending resolution of her claim.
The relevant facts are as follows. Petitioner pled guilty to one count of bank larceny, and a pre-sentence report (“PSR”) was prepared in anticipation of sentencing. The PSR stated that under the sentencing guidelines petitioner’s offense level was 12 and her criminal…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- MedleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. Firooz JaliliCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- UNITED STATES of America, v. Frank SERAFINI; United States of America, v. Frank SerafiniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Samuel L. Eakman, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Monahan v. WinnDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Colton v. AshcroftDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2004
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Estes v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.