Legal Opinion

Rector of St. David's v. Wood

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Multnomah County: Loyal B. Stearns, Judge. Suit by the rector, wardens, and vestrymen of the Parish of St. David’s, a corporation, against Prank Wood, and Virgil E. Watters, the recorder of conveyances of Benton County, Oregon, to enforce the specific performance of a written contract under seal.

Read the full summary

Multnomah County: Loyal B. Stearns, Judge. Suit by the rector, wardens, and vestrymen of the Parish of St. David’s, a corporation, against Prank Wood, and Virgil E. Watters, the recorder of conveyances of Benton County, Oregon, to enforce the specific performance of a written contract under seal. The facts show that the plaintiff is the owner of certain real property in Portland, Oregon, upon which it is desired to erect a church building; that the defendant Prank Wood is the owner of a stone quarry in Benton County, Oregon, and that on the sixteenth of May, 1892, the parties entered into…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

The specific performance of a building contract will rarely be enforced (Pomeroy, Specific Performance, § 23) upon the theory, as announced by Sir Lord Kenyon, master of the rolls, in Errington v. Ainsley, 2 Brown, Ch. 341, “that if one person would not build, another might be found who would,” and for the reason given by Lord Thurlow in Lucas v. Commerford, 3 Brown, Ch. 166, “that the court could not undertake to superintend the construction of a building.” Such contracts have in some instances been enforced, but they were exceptions to the general rule, and are clearly stated by Mr. Justice…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adams v. MessingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City Stores Company v. AmmermanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
  2. McDonough v. Southern Oregon Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Southern Oregon Co. v. QuineOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. White CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  5. Bates v. DanaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API