Legal Opinion

SINIAUSKAS

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2018No. ID 3914PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

27 I&N Dec. 207

(BIA 2018) Interim Decision #3914 Matter of Egidijus SINIAUSKAS, Respondent Decided February 2, 2018 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) In deciding whether to set a bond, an Immigration Judge should consider the nature and circumstances of the alien’s criminal activity, including any arrests and convictions, to determine if the alien is a danger to the community, but family and community ties generally do not mitigate an alien’s dangerousness. (2) Driving under the influence is a significant adverse…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. GUERRABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006
  5. Marmolejo-Campos v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Velasco Lopez v. DeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  2. R-A-V-PBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2020
  3. AkhmedovBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025
  4. CHOC-TUTBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025
  5. C-M-MBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API