Legal Opinion
CHOC-TUT
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided February 25, 2025No. ID 4092PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
29 I&N Dec. 48
(BIA 2025) Interim Decision #4092 Matter of Felipe CHOC-TUT, Respondent Decided by Board February 25, 2025 1 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals While an Immigration Judge may consider a State court’s decision as to dangerousness and the amount of bail that was set in criminal proceedings, an Immigration Judge does not owe a State court custody order deference in immigration bond proceedings. FOR THE RESPONDENT: Niki I. Saleh, Esquire, Chicago, Illinois FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Scott Jebson,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- GUERRABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006
- ADENIJIiBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
- URENABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martinez-RodriguezBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2026
- Albert Zhamagortsyan v. Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center, et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026
- CotrufoBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025
- Dubon MirandaBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025
- Gurkan Soykan v. Kristi Noem, et. al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.