Warren v. Graham
Supreme Court of Iowa
■Appeal from Sioux District Court. — William Hutci-iinson, Judge. Action at law for the alienation of the affections of plaintiff’s husband. The defense was-a general denial and a plea of the statute of limitations. No mitigating facts were pleaded. Upon the issues joined, the case was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $4,875, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
1. Husband and wife : alienation of affections : evidence : sufficiency. I. Plaintiff was married to Dana Warren on May 20, 1891, after a courtship extending over some years. A child was born to them within five months after this marriage, and thereafter four others were born. Plaintiff was about 16 years of age when married, and her husband was about 25. Immediately after marriage, they went to housekeeping in Sioux City, where the husband was then employed, but within a year thereafter, they moved to the town of Hull. The husband was an expert, sign writer, paper hanger and decorator; and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Sexton v. SextonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Rice v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Nevins v. NevinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Walrod v. Webster CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wallace v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Allen v. LindemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Glatstein v. GrundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Summerfield v. PringleIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.