Legal Opinion
Willits v. City of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 25, 2013No. Case No. CV 10-5782 CBM (RZx)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge.
The matter before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion”). [Docket No. 179.]
*1091I. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL OVERVIEW
A. The Substantive Legal Dispute
Plaintiffs allege that Defendants City of Los Angeles (“the City” or “Defendant”) unlawfully failed, and are failing, to properly install and maintain accessible pedestrian rights of way, including curb ramps, sidewalks, crosswalks, pedestrian crossings, and other walkways (“pedestrian rights of way”). (Compl. at ¶ 3.)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Yeskey v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- California Attorney General Opinion 23-1002, California Attorney General Reports2024
- Hamer v. City of TrinidadDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020