Nunnally v. Holt
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the facts as above).
It is, the general rule that, as concerns the venue, the nature of the suit is to be determined upon the primary right violated and the judgment of relief wliich the court may render for the wrongful act or default. Succinctly stated, the plaintiff seeks to have correction or re-execution of a deed, which did not conform to the actual rights of the parties thereto mutually agreed to, for the reason of “mistake of the writer who drew the same.” The remedy was asked for merely for the purpose of correcting the deed, as necessary to a restoration to full rights…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burkitt v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Babno v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Knox v. RedusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
3Cited by11 opinions
- O'Quinn v. O'QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Heinecke v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Lone Star Mut. Life Ass'n v. BrunoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Norvell v. StovallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Page v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.