Legal Opinion

Nunnally v. Holt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 22, 1927No. 3495PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts as above).

It is, the general rule that, as concerns the venue, the nature of the suit is to be determined upon the primary right violated and the judgment of relief wliich the court may render for the wrongful act or default. Succinctly stated, the plaintiff seeks to have correction or re-execution of a deed, which did not conform to the actual rights of the parties thereto mutually agreed to, for the reason of “mistake of the writer who drew the same.” The remedy was asked for merely for the purpose of correcting the deed, as necessary to a restoration to full rights…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burkitt v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Babno v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Knox v. RedusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. O'Quinn v. O'QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Heinecke v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Lone Star Mut. Life Ass'n v. BrunoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Norvell v. StovallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Page v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API