Legal Opinion

Bray v. Memphis State University

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided November 19, 1980No. C-78-2357PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ASSESSING COSTS AND CONTINUING TRIAL DATE

HORTON, District Judge.

The plaintiff in this cause was properly served with notice to be deposed by the attorney for the defendant on October 8, 1980 at 1:00 PM in the offices of her counsel. On October 7,1980, counsel for defendant contacted counsel for plaintiff to confirm the arrangements and was told that plaintiff had expressed reluctance to attend. The two attorneys agreed that defense counsel should contact plaintiff’s counsel prior to boarding his airplane for the flight to Memphis on the eighth. Defense counsel contacted plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bourne, Inc. v. RomeroDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barry G. Lew, M.D. v. Kona HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Kirk v. St. Clair Memorial Hospital, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1982
  3. Proper Yacht Specialists, Inc. v. Wellington (In re Proper Yacht Specialists, Inc.)District Court, D. Georgia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API