Tai Mui v. Esperdy
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.
These cases present questions, of first impression for us, of the interpretation of the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments of 1965, 79 Stat. 911, 912-13, according certain refugees preferences for lawful admission.
I
The 1965 statute had “as its primary objective the abolishment of the national origins quota system for the allocation of immigrant visas and the substitution of a new system of allocation based on a system of preferences which extends priorities in the issuance of immigrant visas to close relatives of U. S. citizens and aliens…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commissioner v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Giova v. RosenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Utah Junk Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Manuel Mendez and Teresa Lastra De Mendez v. H. I. Major, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Francesco Ferrante v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Francesco Ferrante and Kathy Ferrante v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Ahmad Waziri v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Isao Yamada, Mitsu Yamada, Katsumi Yamada and Three Star Products, Ltd. v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Xiao v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Li Cheung v. P. A. Esperdy, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.