State v. Best
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteen, J.
The specific issue presented for consideration is whether defendant’s conviction under the indictment precludes his being tried for the municipal ordinance charges under the doctrine of double jeopardy. The basic theory underlying this doctrine is that it is wrong for one to be subjected more than once to the danger of being punished for an offense. The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that no “person [shall] be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb * *
Section 10 of Article I of the Ohio Constitution provides that “ [n]o person…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. ZimaOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. Mutter (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. HoffmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.