Cropf v. Pantry, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
The issue in this worker’s compensation case is whether substantial evidence supports the Full Commission’s finding *107that the appellant Erika D. Cropf suffered a 30 per cent loss of use of her back because of the injuries Cropf received when she slipped and fell at work. The single commissioner had earlier found Cropf suffered a 5 per cent loss. After the Full Commission made its award, The Pantry, Inc., Cropf s employer, appealed to the Circuit Court. The latter modified the award, finding Cropf sustained only a 15 per cent permanent partial disability. Cropf appeals. We…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McLeod v. Piggly Wiggly Carolina Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Windham v. CITY OF FLORENCESupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
- Lail v. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATIONSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Linen v. RUSCON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Bundrick v. Powell's Garage & Wreckage ServiceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lyles v. Quantum Chemical Co. (Emery)Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Pruitt v. Thermo-Kinetics Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988